Richards v. Palm Beach County Attorney Helena Hvizd et al
Plaintiff: Neville Douglas Richards
Defendant: Palm Beach County Attorney Helena Hvizd, Palm Beach County Attorney's Office and Palm Beach County
Case Number: 9:2023cv80273
Filed: February 17, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Aileen M Cannon
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER CLOSING AND DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 4/4/2023. See attached document for full details. (nan)
February 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT, PERMITTING REPLEADING, AND DENYING AS MOOT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IFP: ORDER denying as moot #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Complaint [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Amended Complaint due by 3/31/2023. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 2/28/2023. See attached document for full details. (nan)
February 17, 2023 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Neville Douglas Richards. (drz)
February 17, 2023 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Aileen M. Cannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (drz)
February 17, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DAMAGES against Palm Beach County, Palm Beach County Attorney Helena Hvizd, Palm Beach County Attorney's Office. Filing fees $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by Neville Douglas Richards. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(drz)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Richards v. Palm Beach County Attorney Helena Hvizd et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Neville Douglas Richards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Palm Beach County Attorney Helena Hvizd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Palm Beach County Attorney's Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Palm Beach County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?