Tuttle v. Social Security
| James Tuttle |
| Acting Commissioner Social Security |
| 9:2023cv80410 |
| March 15, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Ryon M McCabe |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Sarah Patience Jacobs on behalf of James Tuttle. Attorney Sarah Patience Jacobs added to party James Tuttle(pty:pla). (Jacobs, Sarah) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Richard Allen Culbertson on behalf of James Tuttle. Attorney Richard Allen Culbertson added to party James Tuttle(pty:pla). (Culbertson, Richard) |
Filing 4
PAPERLESS ORDER granting Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #3 . Based on Supplemental Rule 3 for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), electronic service will be completed by the Clerk of Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ryon M. McCabe on 3/16/2023. (mw00)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James Tuttle. (jas) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Magistrate Judge Ryon M. McCabe. (jas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Acting Commissioner Social Security. Filing fees $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by James Tuttle. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Affidavit IFP Application)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Goetz, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.