Gueye v. Android et al
Amar Gueye |
Android, T-Mobile, AT&T, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Israel Embassy, United States Government, State of Israel, Israeli Foreign Representatives and All Countries |
9:2023cv80463 |
March 23, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Aileen M Cannon |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 Pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 11-2 and 11th Cir. R. 11-3, the Clerk of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida certifies that the record is complete for purposes of this appeal re: #13 Notice of Appeal, #10 Notice of Appeal, Appeal No. 23-11324-E. The entire record on appeal is available electronically. (apz) |
Filing 17 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM by Amar Gueye re #13 Notice of Appeal, #10 Notice of Appeal. No Transcript Requested. (jes) |
Filing 16 Acknowledgment of Receipt of NOA from USCA re #13 Notice of Appeal, filed by Amar Gueye. Date received by USCA: 5/8/2023. USCA Case Number: 23-11324-E. (apz) |
Filing 15 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SPEEDY TRIAL AND DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS. ORDER denying as moot #8 Motion ; denying as moot #8 Motion to Stay; denying #11 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's Motion for Speedy Trial [ECF No. 8] is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis [ECF No. 11] is DENIED. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 5/3/2023. See attached document for full details. (nan) |
Filing 14 CLERK'S NOTICE of Mailing Pro Se Instructions to Amar Gueye re #13 Notice of Appeal, #10 Notice of Appeal. (apz) |
Transmission of Notice of Appeal, Order under appeal, and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re #13 Notice of Appeal, Notice has been electronically mailed. (apz) |
Filing 13 Notice of Appeal and Response to the Bias Dismissal re #7 Order Dismissing/Closing Case by Amar Gueye. IFP Filed. Within fourteen days of the filing date of a Notice of Appeal, the appellant must complete the Eleventh Circuit Transcript Order Form regardless of whether transcripts are being ordered [Pursuant to FRAP 10(b)]. For information go to our FLSD website under All Forms and look for Transcript Order Form #www.flsd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms. (apz) |
Filing 12 Acknowledgment of Receipt of NOA from USCA re #10 Notice of Appeal, filed by Amar Gueye. Date received by USCA: 04/24/2023. USCA Case Number: 23-11324-E. (jes) |
Transmission of Notice of Appeal, Orders under appeal, and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re #10 Notice of Appeal, Notice has been electronically mailed. (apz) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by Amar Gueye (construed from Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs). (apz) |
Filing 10 Notice of Appeal (SEE DE #9 FOR IMAGE) re #7 Order Dismissing/Closing Case by Amar Gueye. IFP Filed. Within fourteen days of the filing date of a Notice of Appeal, the appellant must complete the Eleventh Circuit Transcript Order Form regardless of whether transcripts are being ordered [Pursuant to FRAP 10(b)]. For information go to our FLSD website under All Forms and look for Transcript Order Form #www.flsd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms. (apz) Modified text on 4/24/2023 (apz). |
Filing 9 Response/Objections to the Bias Dismissal by Amar Gueye re #7 Order Dismissing/Closing Case. (apz) Modified text on 4/24/2023 (apz). |
Filing 8 MOTION for Speedy Trial, MOTION to Stay all Relevant Issues ( Responses due by 5/4/2023) by Amar Gueye. (ls) |
Filing 7 ORDER SCREENING COMPLAINT AND DISMISSING CASE. Closing Case. (With Prejudice) Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 4/10/2023. See attached document for full details. (nan) |
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against AT&T, Android, T-Mobile, United States Government, State of Israel, Israeli Foreign Representatives, All Countries filed in response to Order Granting Motion for Leave, filed by Amar Gueye.(ls) |
Filing 5 ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT AND PERMITTING REPLEADING: ORDER denying as moot #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Amended Complaint due by 4/28/2023). Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 11/28/2022. See attached document for full details. (nan) |
Filing 4 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) will not be issued. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is pending. Filer may file a Notice of Filing Proposed Summons(es) with the summons attached upon motion being granted or payment of filing fee. (ls) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Amar Gueye. (ls) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Aileen M. Cannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (ls) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AT&T, Android, Israel Embassy, T-Mobile, U.S. Dept. of Justice. Filing fees $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by Amar Gueye. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(ls) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.