Spence v. Leonard Associates Inc.
| Garfield Spence |
| Leonard Associates Inc. |
| 9:2023cv80472 |
| March 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Aileen M Cannon |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER Dismissing Case / Closing Case. (With Prejudice) Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, effective May 4, 2023, the date on which Plaintiff filed the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal [ECF No. 5]. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 5/5/2023. See attached document for full details. (nan)
|
| Filing 7 Clerk's NOTICE of Compliance (Copy of Order Mailed to Defendant) re #6 Order to Show Cause (nwn) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Garfield Spence (Leal, Alberto) |
| Set/Reset Response/Answer Due Deadline: Leonard Associates Inc. response/answer due 5/15/2023. Per Order, DE#6 (nan) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT. ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant must file an answer or other responsive pleading on or before May 15, 2023. If Defendant fails to comply with this Order, such failure may be deemed sufficient cause for the Court to instruct Plaintiff to file a motion for Clerks Default. See S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1(c) (Show Cause Response due by 5/15/2023). Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 5/3/2023. See attached document for full details. (nan)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Garfield Spence. Leonard Associates Inc. served on 4/10/2023, response/answer due 5/1/2023. (Leal, Alberto) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Leonard Associates Inc. (rbe) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Aileen M. Cannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (rbe) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Leonard Associates, Inc.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16470039, filed by Garfield Spence. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Leal, Alberto) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Spence v. Leonard Associates Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Garfield Spence | |
| Represented By: | Alberto R. Leal |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Leonard Associates Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
