Cajuste v. Private Camp - GGO et al
| Ashney L. Cajuste |
| Private Camp - GGO, John Doe, Private Camp GGO and Federal Department Corrections |
| 9:2023cv81057 |
| July 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Robert N Scola |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE; DENYING AS MOOT #3 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; AND CLOSING CASE. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr., on 7/25/2023. See attached document for full details. (caw)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER. Dismissing Case / Closing Case. (Without Prejudice) Denied as moot : #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Ashney L. Cajuste. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 7/25/2023. See attached document for full details. (mee)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ashney L. Cajuste. (amb) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (amb) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against John Doe, Private Camp GGO, Federal Department Corrections, Private Camp - GGO("Owner"), Private Camp - GGO(Housing Department). Filing fee $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by Ashney L. Cajuste. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(amb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
