Paul v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Cheryl Paul |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 9:2023cv81151 |
| August 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| William Matthewman |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Timothy Stevens on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security. Attorney Timothy Stevens added to party Commissioner of Social Security(pty:dft). (Stevens, Timothy) |
| Filing 10 Joint Notice and Consent to Jurisdiction US Magistrate Judge signed by all parties . Filed by Cheryl Paul (Atkins, Sarah) |
Filing 9
PAPERLESS ORDER REQUIRING CLARIFICATION OF PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF CONSENT #8 : This matter is before the Court pursuant to the following: (1) the Court's Order Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, Setting Social Security Case Procedures, and Briefing Schedule ("Order Regarding Jurisdiction") [DE 7]; and (2) Plaintiff's unilateral Notice of Consent to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge [DE 8] filed thereafter. In its Order Regarding Jurisdiction [DE 7], the Court noted that "if no party objects within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, then consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction is presumed and deemed agreed to by the parties...." [DE 7 at 2]. The Court's review of Plaintiff's Notice of Consent [DE 8] shows that it was only signed by Plaintiff's counsel. The Court therefore requests clarification as to whether both Plaintiff and Defendant consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. If all parties are in agreement, the parties may jointly sign and file a Notice of Consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. If any party objects to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, then a notice of objection should be promptly filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge William Matthewman on 10/5/2023. (cpe)
|
| Filing 8 Notice and Consent to Jurisdiction US Magistrate Judge signed by all parties . Filed by Cheryl Paul (Atkins, Sarah) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER REGARDING MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION, SETTING SOCIAL SECURITY CASE PROCEDURES, AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Magistrate Judge William Matthewman on 10/2/2023. See attached document for full details. (pc)
|
| Filing 6 Social Security Transcript/Answer/Administrative Record filed. Transcripts date: 9/11/23. Pages: 1-934 (Sausser, Jill) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jill Sausser on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security. Attorney Jill Sausser added to party Commissioner of Social Security(pty:dft). (Sausser, Jill) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS [DE 3]. Plaintiff is hereby granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. USM Service NOT Ordered. Signed by Magistrate Judge William Matthewman on 8/15/2023. See attached document for full details. (gqa)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Cheryl Paul. (wce) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Magistrate Judge William Matthewman. (wce) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi. Filing fees $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by Cheryl Paul. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Application to Proceed IFP)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Atkins, Sarah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
