Restrepo v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Angela Maria Restrepo |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 9:2023cv81159 |
| August 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| William Matthewman |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER REGARDING MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION, SETTING SOCIAL SECURITY CASE PROCEDURES, AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Magistrate Judge William Matthewman on 10/10/2023. See attached document for full details. (nwn)
|
| Filing 4 Social Security Transcript/Answer/Administrative Record filed. Transcripts date: 9/13/2023. Pages: 1-746 (Olszewski, Natalie) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Natalie Olszewski on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security. Attorney Natalie Olszewski added to party Commissioner of Social Security(pty:dft). (Olszewski, Natalie) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Magistrate Judge William Matthewman (nwn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16850364, filed by Angela Maria Restrepo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeal Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Brady, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
