Spence v. STORE 66, INC.
| Garfield Spence |
| STORE 66, INC. |
| 9:2023cv81226 |
| September 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Bruce E Reinhart |
| Robin L Rosenberg |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE, CALENDAR CALL, PRETRIAL DEADLINES, ANDTRIAL DATE, ORDER OF REQUIREMENTS, ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MEDIATION: Fact Discovery due by 3/4/2024. Expert Discovery due by 3/18/2024. Dispositive Motions due by 4/3/2024. Jury Trial set for 7/1/2024 09:00 AM in West Palm Beach Division before Judge Robin L. Rosenberg. Calendar Call set for 6/26/2024 10:30 AM before Judge Robin L. Rosenberg (Zoom). Status Conference set for 4/17/2024 10:00 AM before Judge Robin L. Rosenberg (Zoom). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(l)(A) and the Magistrate Judge Rules of the Local Rules of the Southern District of Florida, the above-captioned cause is referred to United States Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart for appropriate disposition of all pro hac vice motions, motions to substitute counsel, and pretrial motions related to discovery. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg on 10/27/2023. See attached document for full details. (rbe) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
|
|
Filing 11
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg (bkd)
|
| Filing 10 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by STORE 66, INC.. (Gruseck, Thomas) |
| Filing 9 Clerk's Notice to Filer re #8 MOTION for Extension of Time to file responsive pleading re #3 Summons Issued. Filer Selected the Wrong Motion Relief(s); ERROR - The Filer selected the wrong motion relief(s) when docketing the motion. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document but future motions filed must include applicable reliefs. AND Incorrect Document Link; ERROR - The filed document was not correctly linked to the related docket entry. The correction was made by the Clerk. It is not necessary to refile this document but future filings must comply with the instructions in the CM/ECF Attorney User's Manual. (ls) |
| Filing 8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by STORE 66, INC.. Responses due by 10/18/2023 (Gruseck, Thomas) Modified Relief and document link on 10/5/2023 (ls). |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Thomas Joseph Gruseck on behalf of STORE 66, INC.. Attorney Thomas Joseph Gruseck added to party STORE 66, INC.(pty:dft). (Gruseck, Thomas) |
|
Filing 6
Standing Discovery Order For Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart on 10/2/2023. See attached document for full details. (rbe)
|
|
Filing 5
Order Of Reference To Magistrate Judge And Order Of Court-Mandated Requirements On Service, Defaults, And Joint Scheduling Reports. The above-captioned cause is referred to United States Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart for appropriate disposition of all pro hac vice motions, motions to substitute counsel, and pretrial motions related to discovery. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg on 9/29/2023. See attached document for full details. (rbe)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Garfield Spence. STORE 66, INC. served on 9/20/2023, response/answer due 10/11/2023. (Leal, Alberto) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to STORE 66, INC. (rbe) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robin L. Rosenberg and Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (rbe) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against STORE 66, INC.. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16892032, filed by Garfield Spence. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Leal, Alberto) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Spence v. STORE 66, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Garfield Spence | |
| Represented By: | Alberto R. Leal |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: STORE 66, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Thomas Joseph Gruseck |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
