Spence v. 834 S CONGRESS, LLC
| Garfield Spence |
| 834 S CONGRESS, LLC and NS 2 PROJECT LLC |
| 9:2024cv80011 |
| January 7, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Donald M Middlebrooks |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER CLOSING CASE. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE THIS CASE. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 2/6/2024. See attached document for full details. (amb)
|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Garfield Spence (Leal, Alberto) |
| Filing 15 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #12 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Garfield Spence. NS 2 PROJECT LLC served on 1/17/2024, response/answer due 2/7/2024. (Leal, Alberto) |
| Filing 14 Summons Issued as to NS 2 PROJECT LLC. (ebz) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Garfield Spence (Leal, Alberto) |
| Filing 12 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against NS 2 PROJECT LLC, filed by Garfield Spence.(Leal, Alberto) |
| Filing 11 Notice of Entry of Parties Listed NOTE: New Filer(s) will appear twice, since they are also a new party in the case. New Filer(s)/Party(s): NS 2 PROJECT LLC. (Leal, Alberto) |
| Filing 10 First RESPONSE to court's Interrogatories by Garfield Spence. (Leal, Alberto) |
|
Filing 9
ADA TITLE III SCHEDULING ORDER: Mediation Deadline 4/18/2024. Status Report due by 4/15/2024. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 1/9/2024. See attached document for full details. (nan)
|
| Filing 8 Second NOTICE of filing civil cover sheet (corrected) by Garfield Spence (Leal, Alberto) |
| Filing 7 Clerk's Notice to Filer re #5 Notice (Other). Login/Signature Block Violation; CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED WITHIN 3 DAYS - The name of attorney e-filing this document via their CM/ECF login does not match the name of attorney on the signature block of the document. The name used for login must match typed name on signature block of the document. This filing is a violation of Section 3J(1) of CM/ECF Admin Procedures and LR 5.1(b). Filer must File a Notice of Striking, then refile document pursuant to CM/ECF Admin Procedures and Local Rules. (Missing Attorney's signature) (drz) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to 834 S CONGRESS, LLC. (drz) |
| Filing 5 First NOTICE of filling Civil cover Sheet by Garfield Spence (Leal, Alberto) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Garfield Spence (Leal, Alberto) |
| Filing 3 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. No Civil Cover Sheet. Filer is instructed to file a Notice (Other) with the Civil Cover Sheet attached within 24 hours of the notice. (wce) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (wce) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 834 S CONGRESS, LLC. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-17193266, filed by Garfield Spence.(Leal, Alberto) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
