Roberts v. Social Security Administration
Jessica Ilene Roberts |
Social Security Administration |
9:2024cv80047 |
January 16, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Bruce E Reinhart |
Social Security: HIA |
42 U.S.C. ยง 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER granting #4 Plaintiff's Motion for Referral to Volunteer Attorney Program. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart on 2/22/2024. See attached document for full details. (dc00) |
Filing 10 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 2/15/2024 in the amount of $ 405.00, receipt number 8758 (mee) |
Filing 9 PAPERLESS ORDER denying #8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis for failure to comply with the Court's January 18, 2024 Order (ECF No. #5 ). On or before March 1, 2024, the petitioner shall pay the Clerks filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart on 2/1/2024. (kso) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jessica Ilene Roberts. (mee) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Timothy Clark on behalf of Social Security Administration. Attorney Timothy Clark added to party Social Security Administration(pty:dft). (Clark, Timothy) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Compliance re #5 ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (ECF NO. #3 ). A copy of the order and the IFP form was provided to the Plaintiff. (rbe) |
Filing 5 ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (ECF NO. #3 ). Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for IFP relief (ECF No. #3 ) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff may submit a new IFP motion that includes the information stated above on or before February 5, 2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart on 1/18/2024. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 IFP Form) (rbe) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Referral to Volunteer Attorney Program by Jessica Ilene Roberts. (drz) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jessica Ilene Roberts. (drz) |
Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart. (drz) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration. Filing fees $ 405.00. IFP Filed, filed by Jessica Ilene Roberts. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit, #4 Summon(s))Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (drz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Roberts v. Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jessica Ilene Roberts | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
Represented By: | Noticing Social Security General Counsel of SSA |
Represented By: | Noticing Social Security US Attorney |
Represented By: | Timothy Clark |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.