Amplitech Group, Inc. v. Truist Bank
| Amplitech Group, Inc. |
| Truist Bank |
| 9:2024cv80234 |
| February 28, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| William Matthewman |
| Donald M Middlebrooks |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 Plaintiff's RESPONSE to #12 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #8 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , 19 Order on Motion for Extension of Time, by Amplitech Group, Inc.. (Coleman, Roderick) |
Filing 19
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #18 . Plaintiff requests until April 26, 2024, to file its response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (DE #12 ). As the motion is unopposed, I will grant the requested relief. Plaintiff shall have until April 26, 2024, to file its Response. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 4/25/2024. (kid)
|
| Filing 18 MOTION for Extension of Time to file response to Motion to Dismiss re #12 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #8 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , 17 Order on Motion for Extension of Time by Amplitech Group, Inc.. Responses due by 5/8/2024. (Coleman, Roderick) |
|
Filing 17
PAPERLESS ORDER denying #15 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff failed to include a certificate of conferral, as required by Local Rule 7.1(a)(3). Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 4/23/2024. (kid)
|
|
Filing 16
PAPERLESS ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Scheduling Conference set for 5/6/2024 at 11:00 AM in the West Palm Beach Division before U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman to take place via Zoom Video Teleconference (VTC). Any motions to modify the existing trial date should be filed two (2) business days prior to the Scheduling Conference. Motions to modify the trial date must specifically state the basis for the request, including detailed factual support, and must provide a compelling reason. The parties are further advised that the Court is strongly disinclined to modify the trial date based upon the scheduling "tracks" contained within the Local Rules and/or based upon vague references to the complexities of the case. To log in through ZoomGov Meeting, use Meeting ID: 160 540 3826 and Passcode: 246129. All counsel shall appear by both audio and video. Signed by Magistrate Judge William Matthewman on 4/22/2024. (no00)
|
| Filing 15 MOTION for Extension of Time respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss re #12 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #8 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , 14 Order on Motion for Extension of Time, by Amplitech Group, Inc.. Responses due by 5/6/2024. (Coleman, Roderick) |
|
Filing 14
PAPERLESS ORDER denying #13 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff seeks a ten-day extension to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (DE #12 ). Motions for extension of time must set forth good cause supported by specific facts. Plaintiff does not provide any reason for the requested extension. The Parties' may not modify court filing deadlines by agreement. Accordingly, the motion is denied. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 4/16/2024. (kid)
|
| Filing 13 Plaintiff's MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to Motion to Dismiss re #12 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #8 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Amplitech Group, Inc.. Responses due by 4/29/2024. (Coleman, Roderick) |
| Filing 12 Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS #8 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Truist Bank. Responses due by 4/16/2024. (Agnello, Nicholas) |
| Filing 11 Defendant's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Truist Bank identifying Corporate Parent BB&T Corporation, Corporate Parent Branch Banking and Trust Company, Corporate Parent Truist Financial Corporation, Corporate Parent SunTrust Bank, Corporate Parent SunTrust Bank Holding Company, Corporate Parent SunTrust Banks, Inc. for Truist Bank (Agnello, Nicholas) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Nicholas Steven Agnello on behalf of Truist Bank. Attorney Nicholas Steven Agnello added to party Truist Bank(pty:dft). (Agnello, Nicholas) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER REFERRING CASE AND SETTING TRIAL DATE. ( Jury Trial set for 11/4/2024 09:00 AM in West Palm Beach Division before Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks., Calendar Call set for 10/30/2024 01:15 PM in West Palm Beach Division before Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks.) Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 3/14/2024. See attached document for full details. (kpe) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
|
| Filing 8 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Truist Bank, filed by Amplitech Group, Inc..(Coleman, Roderick) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Truist Bank. (jas) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER REGARDING JURISDICTIONAL DEFECTS. Amended Complaint due by 3/6/2024. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 3/1/2024. See attached document for full details. (caw)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Amplitech Group, Inc. re #1 Complaint filed by Amplitech Group, Inc. (Coleman, Roderick) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing Civil Cover Sheet by Amplitech Group, Inc. re #1 Complaint, 3 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. (Coleman, Roderick) |
| Filing 3 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. No Civil Cover Sheet. Filer is instructed to file a Notice (Other) with the Civil Cover Sheet attached within 24 hours of the notice. (caw) |
| Filing 2 Clerk's Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (caw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Amplitech Group, Inc.. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-17329107, filed by Amplitech Group, Inc..(Coleman, Roderick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Amplitech Group, Inc. v. Truist Bank | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Amplitech Group, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Roderick Flynn Coleman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Truist Bank | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas Steven Agnello |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
