Fatade et al v. Chase Bank, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
Ayokunle Fatade and Dena Fatade |
Chase Bank, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., James Dimon and The Corporation Trust Company |
9:2024cv80257 |
March 7, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
William Matthewman |
Donald M Middlebrooks |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 MOTION to Quash by Chase Bank, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Keller, Courtney) |
Filing 19 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Ayokunle Fatade. James Dimon served on 3/13/2024, response/answer due 4/3/2024. For image see d.e. #18 . (mee) |
Filing 18 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Ayokunle Fatade. Chase Bank, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. served on 3/12/2024, response/answer due 4/2/2024. (mee) |
Filing 17 CLERK'S NOTICE of Compliance. Copy of DE#16 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE VIA ZOOM VIDEO TELECONFERENCE (VTC) mailed to Ayokunle Fatade. (nwn) |
|
|
|
Filing 13 Amended MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Complaint FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and Request for Injunction with Prejudice by Chase Bank, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. Responses due by 4/30/2024. (Keller, Courtney) |
|
Filing 11 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Complaint FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and Request for Injunction with Prejudice by Chase Bank, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. Responses due by 4/29/2024. (Keller, Courtney) |
|
Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Chase Bank, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Keller, Courtney) |
Filing 8 MOTION Motion for Relief from Order and/or To Amend Order Granting Extension of Time re 7 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer,,, by Chase Bank, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Keller, Courtney) |
|
Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by Chase Bank, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., James Dimon. Attorney Courtney M Keller added to party Chase Bank, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.(pty:dft), Attorney Courtney M Keller added to party James Dimon(pty:dft). (Keller, Courtney) |
|
Filing 4 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 3/7/2024 in the amount of $ 405.00, receipt number 8802 (amb) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Chase Bank, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., James Dimon. (amb) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (amb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Chase Bank, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., James Dimon, The Corporation Trust Company. Filing fees $ 405.00, filed by Ayokunie Fatade, Dena Fatade. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(amb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.