Ivory, John v. Deputy Miller et al
| John Henry Ivory |
| Deputy Miller and Deputy Woody |
| 9:2024cv80885 |
| July 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Melissa Damian |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Resident Account Statement by John Henry Ivory. (wce) |
Filing 4
ORDER: The Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [ECF No. #3 ] is DENIED. If Plaintiff decides to initiate a new case by re-filing the Complaint in this Court, he must either (1) pay the $405.00 filing fee; or (2) file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and attach a certified copy of his prison account for the six-month period preceding the filing of the Complaint. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is INSTRUCTED to CLOSE this case. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Melissa Damian on 7/30/2024. See attached document for full details. (wce)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by John Henry Ivory. (kma) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Melissa Damian (kma) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Deputy Miller, Deputy Woody. Filing fee $ 405.00 (IFP Motion filed), filed by John Henry Ivory. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s))(kma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
