RASHLEY v. Sicuro Health LLC
| KYLE BUTLER RASHLEY |
| Sicuro Health LLC |
| 9:2024cv80940 |
| August 3, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sicuro Health LLC. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-17729771, filed by KYLE BUTLER RASHLEY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Kaufman, Avi) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: RASHLEY v. Sicuro Health LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sicuro Health LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: KYLE BUTLER RASHLEY | |
| Represented By: | Avi Robert Kaufman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.