Fernandez v. The Cato Corporation
| Nelson Fernandez |
| The Cato Corporation doing business as Versona |
| 9:2024cv81113 |
| September 13, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Aileen M Cannon |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Joint MOTION to Amend/Correct the Briefing Schedule by The Cato Corporation. Responses due by 11/25/2024. (Buese, Alexis) |
| Filing 14 Statement of: Coporate Disclosure by The Cato Corporation (Buese, Alexis) |
| Filing 13 Defendant's MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss or Stay this Action by The Cato Corporation. Responses due by 11/21/2024. (Buese, Alexis) |
| Filing 12 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss by The Cato Corporation. Responses due by 11/21/2024. (Buese, Alexis) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Alexis Miller Buese on behalf of The Cato Corporation (Buese, Alexis) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Striking #8 Notice of Attorney Appearance filed by The Cato Corporation b/b/a Versona by The Cato Corporation (Buese, Alexis) |
| Filing 9 Clerk's Notice to Filer re #8 Notice of Attorney Appearance. Login/Signature Block Violation; CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED WITHIN 3 DAYS - The name of attorney e-filing this document via their CM/ECF login does not match the name of attorney on the signature block of the document. The name used for login must match typed name on signature block of the document. This filing is a violation of Section 3J(1) of CM/ECF Admin Procedures and LR 5.1(b). Filer must File a Notice of Striking, then refile document pursuant to CM/ECF Admin Procedures and Local Rules. (drz) |
| Filing 8 Stricken per DE #10 -NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Alexis Miller Buese on behalf of The Cato Corporation (Buese, Alexis) Modified text on 11/7/2024 (drz). |
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER granting Defendant's #6 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint #1 . On or before November 7, 2024, Defendant shall file a response or answer to Plaintiff's Complaint #1 . Moving forward, any requests for extension or enlargement must be filed sufficiently in advance of the deadline at issue. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 10/9/2024. (bbk)
|
| Set/Reset Response/Answer Due Deadline: The Cato Corporation response/answer due 11/7/2024. (per order DE#7) (drz) |
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by The Cato Corporation. Attorney Alexis Miller Buese added to party The Cato Corporation(pty:dft). (Buese, Alexis) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Nelson Fernandez. The Cato Corporation served on 9/17/2024, response/answer due 10/8/2024. (Hannah, Roderick) |
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICES ON SEALING/REDACTION: Notwithstanding the requirements of Local Rule 5.4 and/or any protective order, the parties are prohibited from filing anything under seal or from redacting any content from a court filing or exhibit/attachment (except for the personal data identifiers listed in Section 6A of this District's CM/ECF Administrative Procedures) unless the party with a stated interest in sealing/redaction first seeks and obtains permission from the Court via a motion for leave. The motion for leave must be filed after meaningful conferral with the opposing party (or parties) and be filed publicly except as authorized by prior Court order. Additionally, the motion for leave shall specify the particularized basis for sealing the proposed material; shall describe the information/documents to be sealed with as much specificity as possible but without attaching the proposed sealed material; shall indicate the proposed duration of the seal request and the reasons why means other than sealing are unavailable or unsatisfactory; shall contain a separate certificate of conference section indicating the results of the parties' meaningful conferral; and shall be filed at last three business days before any related deadline to permit adequate Court consideration. The party seeking authorization to seal material shall not file or otherwise attach the subject material until the Court has ruled on the motion for leave. Finally, all parties are advised that mere designation of material as confidential and/or otherwise subject to a protective order does not bind the Court, does not supplant the requirements of the Local Rules on sealing, and does not otherwise relieve the party seeking sealing/redaction from justifying its request under applicable legal principals governing the presumption of public access to civil proceedings. Failure to comply with this Notice may result in immediate unsealing of any unauthorized shielded material. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 9/13/2024. (bbk)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to The Cato Corporation. (pc) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Aileen M. Cannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Ryon M. McCabe is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (pc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Cato Corporation. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-17833388, filed by Nelson Fernandez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Summon(s))(Hannah, Roderick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Fernandez v. The Cato Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Cato Corporation doing business as Versona | |
| Represented By: | Alexis Miller Buese |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nelson Fernandez | |
| Represented By: | Roderick Victor Hannah |
| Represented By: | Pelayo M. Duran |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
