UNITED STATES ex rel. THOMPSON CONTRACTING GROUP, INC., v. COAST TO COAST DOCK AND SEAWALL, LLC
| UNITED STATES ex rel. THOMPSON CONTRACTING GROUP, INC., |
| COAST TO COAST DOCK AND SEAWALL, LLC |
| 9:2024mc80201 |
| February 21, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Donald M Middlebrooks |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 STATUS REPORT by UNITED STATES ex rel. THOMPSON CONTRACTING GROUP, INC., (Padula, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Action/Publication filed by UNITED STATES ex rel. THOMPSON CONTRACTING GROUP, INC.,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Return of Service - Coast to Coast re MTC in MC case, #2 Exhibit B - Return of Service - Coast to Coast re MTC in CIV case)(Padula, Stephen) |
Filing 3
PAPERLESS ORDER requiring status update. Plaintiff filed a petition on February 21, 2024, seeking an order compelling Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's subpoena to produce documents. However, the docket does not reflect any activity since the filing of the petition, nor does it indicate whether the Defendant was served with the petition. Moreover, no counsel has yet appeared on Defendant's behalf. Accordingly, by April 19, 2024, the Plaintiff SHALL FILE a Status Report advising the Court what progress has been made in this matter and how Plaintiff intends to proceed. Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal without prejudice. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 4/16/2024. (kid)
|
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks. (wce) |
| Filing 1 Plaintiff's Petition/Motion (Complaint) RE: Subpoena to Enforce from Another District PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT COAST TO COAST DOCK AND SEAWALL, LLC TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS. Filing fee $52.00 receipt number AFLSDC-17309174, filed by UNITED STATES ex rel. THOMPSON CONTRACTING GROUP, INC.,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Subpoena to Produce Documents to Coast to Coast Dock and Seawall, #2 Exhibit 2 - Notice of Serving Non-Party Subpoena for Production of Records to Coast to Coast.pdf, #3 Exhibit 3 - Return of Service - Subpoena upon Coast to Coast.pdf, #4 Exhibit 4 - Email.pdf, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Padula, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: UNITED STATES ex rel. THOMPSON CONTRACTING GROUP, INC., v. COAST TO COAST DOCK AND SEAWALL, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES ex rel. THOMPSON CONTRACTING GROUP, INC., | |
| Represented By: | Robert Nathan Pate |
| Represented By: | Stephen Joseph Padula |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: COAST TO COAST DOCK AND SEAWALL, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
