Turbocode LLC v. Airspan Networks Inc.
| Turbocode LLC |
| Airspan Networks Inc. |
| 9:2025cv80307 |
| March 4, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Bruce E Reinhart |
| Robin L Rosenberg |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 0271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney David R. Bennett. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart on 4/14/2025. (vbi)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for David R. Bennett. Filing Fee $ 250.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-18364765 by Turbocode LLC. Responses due by 4/28/2025. (Attachments: #1 Certification Certification of David Bennett, #2 Certification Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Text of Proposed Order proposed Order Granting Motion to Appear Pro Hac)(Sanks, Terry) |
|
Filing 6
STANDING DISCOVERY ORDER for Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart. on 3/6/2025. See attached document for full details. (ls)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart for Discovery Matters and a Rule 16 conference, and Order of Court-Mandated Requirements on Service, Defaults, and Joint Scheduling Reports. Signed by Judge Robin L. Rosenberg on 3/6/2025. See attached document for full details. (ls)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Airspan Networks Inc.. (ksr) |
| Filing 3 FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (ksr) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Robin L. Rosenberg and Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (ksr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-18253801, filed by Turbocode LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s) proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Certification Corporate Disclosure Statement)(Sanks, Terry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Turbocode LLC v. Airspan Networks Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Turbocode LLC | |
| Represented By: | Terry Marcus Sanks |
| Represented By: | David R. Bennett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Airspan Networks Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
