NewsMax Broadcasting, LLC v. Fox Corporation et al
| NewsMax Broadcasting, LLC |
| Fox Corporation and Fox News Network, LLC |
| 9:2025cv81091 |
| September 3, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Aileen M Cannon |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 0001 Antitrust Litigation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER CLOSING CASE. Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal without Prejudice, filed on September 11, 2025 [ECF No. #11 ]. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE against all Defendants, effective September 11, 2025, the date on which Plaintiff filed the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal [ECF No. #11 ]. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 9/12/2025. See attached document for full details. (nan)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice by NewsMax Broadcasting, LLC. Attorney Agustina Kloosterboer added to party NewsMax Broadcasting, LLC(pty:pla). (Kloosterboer, Agustina) |
|
Filing 10
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consents to Designation, and Requests to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney Michael J. Guzman. The Court reserves the power to withdraw permission for special appearance at any time. Failure to abide by any court order or failure to appear at any scheduled matter may result in immediate revocation of counsel's pro hac vice status. Local counsel must be ready to adequately represent the party at any time. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 9/7/2025. (bbk)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER DISMISSING SHOTGUN COMPLAINT AND PERMITTING REPLEADING. The Complaint [ECF No. #1 ] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint that is consistent with this Order on or before September 11, 2025. (Amended Complaint due by 9/11/2025.) Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 9/4/2025. See attached document for full details. (nan)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER REQUIRING COMBINED RESPONSES AND SETTING TYPEFACE REQUIREMENTS. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 9/4/2025. See attached document for full details. (nan)
|
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by NewsMax Broadcasting, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Newsmax Media Inc. for NewsMax Broadcasting, LLC (Randall, Samuel) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Michael J. Guzman. Filing Fee $ 250.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-18762289 by NewsMax Broadcasting, LLC. Responses due by 9/18/2025. (Randall, Samuel) |
| Filing 5 Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney Michael J. Guzman, mailing date September 4, 2025, (pt) |
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICES ON SEALING/REDACTION: Notwithstanding the requirements of Local Rule 5.4 and/or any protective order, the parties are prohibited from filing anything under seal or from redacting any content from a court filing or exhibit/attachment (except for the personal data identifiers listed in Section 6A of this District's CM/ECF Administrative Procedures) unless the party with a stated interest in sealing/redaction first seeks and obtains permission from the Court via a motion for leave. The motion for leave must be filed after meaningful conferral with the opposing party (or parties) and be filed publicly except as authorized by prior Court order. Additionally, the motion for leave shall specify the particularized basis for sealing the proposed material; shall describe the information/documents to be sealed with as much specificity as possible but without attaching the proposed sealed material; shall indicate the proposed duration of the seal request and the reasons why means other than sealing are unavailable or unsatisfactory; shall contain a separate certificate of conference section indicating the results of the parties' meaningful conferral; and shall be filed at last three business days before any related deadline to permit adequate Court consideration. The party seeking authorization to seal material shall not file or otherwise attach the subject material until the Court has ruled on the motion for leave. Finally, all parties are advised that mere designation of material as confidential and/or otherwise subject to a protective order does not bind the Court, does not supplant the requirements of the Local Rules on sealing, and does not otherwise relieve the party seeking sealing/redaction from justifying its request under applicable legal principals governing the presumption of public access to civil proceedings. Failure to comply with this Notice may result in immediate unsealing of any unauthorized shielded material. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 9/3/2025. (bbk)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Fox Corporation, Fox News Network, LLC. (nan) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Aileen M. Cannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Ryon M. McCabe is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (nan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-18754561, filed by NewsMax Broadcasting, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s))(Randall, Samuel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
