Glover v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
| Charles Lee Glover |
| The GEO Group, Inc. and Dr Hipolito Matos |
| 9:2026cv80089 |
| January 27, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Melissa Damian |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Summons Issued as to Hipolito Matos (2). (scn) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summonses by Charles Lee Glover. (scn) |
Filing 8
ORDER re #1 Complaint 42 USC 1983 or Bivens shall Proceed in Part. Signed by Judge Melissa Damian on 5/26/2026. See attached document for full details. (ls)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER Regarding Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge Melissa Damian on 5/12/2026. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 Supplement IFP Short-Form) (ls)
|
| Filing 6 Clerk's Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 4/6/2026 in the amount of $405.00, receipt number FLS316059. (jes) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE of Compliance re #4 Order Requiring Payment of Filing Fee or Filing IFP Motion. (ls) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING PAYMENT OF FILING FEE OR FILING OF MOTION TO PROCEED IFP WITH DETAILED AFFIDAVIT: Filing Fee due by 4/3/2026. Motions due by 4/3/2026. Signed by Judge Melissa Damian on 3/4/2026. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 Supplement IFP Motion (Short-Form)) (ls)
|
|
Filing 3
PAPERLESS ORDER ON COURT PRACTICE IN CASES WITH MULTIPLE DEFENDANTS THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon a sua sponte review of the record. To better manage the orderly progress of the case, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:1. Plaintiff shall file proof of service, as to each Defendant, within seven (7) days of perfecting service on each Defendant. 2. Defendants shall file their responses and motions jointly. a. If there are conflicts of position, the co-Defendants shall file a motion for leave to file separate responses or motions, in which they must describe what those conflicts are.b. If the co-Defendants need more than twenty (20) pages for their joint responses or motions, they shall file a motion for leave to file excess pages, which the Court will consider expeditiously. 3. The co-Defendants may file separate answers to the Complaint. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the time for responsive pleadings--for all Defendants--begins to run once all Defendants have either (1) been served or (2) waived service. If the Defendants face response periods of different lengths--say, because one Defendant has been personally served whereas another has waived service--all Defendants will be subject to the longest of those response periods. 4. Although all Defendants will be subject to the longest of all response periods, each served Defendant must still file a notice of appearance within twenty-one (21) days of being served with the Complaint (or sixty (60) days if service is waived).5. Failure to comply with these procedures may result in sanctions, including the striking of the motion(s) or response(s). Signed by Judge Melissa Damian on 1/27/2026. (mul)
|
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Melissa Damian (kma) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Hipolito Matos, The GEO Group, Inc.. Filing fee $ 405.00 (not paid/ IFP Motion not filed), filed by Charles Lee Glover. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s))(kma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
