Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. Functional Evaluation Testing of Florida, Inc. et al
| Government Employees Insurance Co., Geico Indemnity Co., GEICO General Insurance Company and Geico Casualty Co. |
| Functional Evaluation Testing of Florida, Inc., Michael D. Chillemi, D.C and Eric Ferdinand Ciliberti, M.D. |
| 9:2026cv80096 |
| January 28, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Aileen M Cannon |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Plaintiff's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by GEICO General Insurance Company, Geico Casualty Co., Geico Indemnity Co., Government Employees Insurance Co. identifying Corporate Parent GEICO Corporation, Corporate Parent Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. for GEICO General Insurance Company, Geico Casualty Co., Geico Indemnity Co., Government Employees Insurance Co. (Gershenoff, Max) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Government Employees Insurance Co., Geico Casualty Co., GEICO General Insurance Company, Geico Indemnity Co.. Michael D. Chillemi, D.C waiver sent on 2/5/2026, response/answer due 4/6/2026; Eric Ferdinand Ciliberti, M.D. waiver sent on 2/5/2026, response/answer due 4/6/2026; Functional Evaluation Testing of Florida, Inc. waiver sent on 2/5/2026, response/answer due 4/6/2026. (Gershenoff, Max) |
Filing 5
ORDER REQUIRING COMBINED RESPONSES AND SETTING TYPEFACE REQUIREMENTS: To better manage the orderly progress of the case, it is hereby ORDERED that no Defendant shall file a response or answer until all Defendants in this action have been served. After all Defendants have been served, Defendants shall submit a single combined response or separate answers within the time allowed for the last-served Defendant to respond. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 1/29/2026. See attached document for full details. (wce)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICES ON SEALING/REDACTION: Notwithstanding the requirements of Local Rule 5.4 and/or any protective order, the parties are prohibited from filing anything under seal or from redacting any content from a court filing or exhibit/attachment (except for the personal data identifiers listed in Section 6A of this District's CM/ECF Administrative Procedures) unless the party with a stated interest in sealing/redaction first seeks and obtains permission from the Court via a motion for leave. The motion for leave must be filed after meaningful conferral with the opposing party (or parties) and be filed publicly except as authorized by prior Court order. Additionally, the motion for leave shall specify the particularized basis for sealing the proposed material; shall describe the information/documents to be sealed with as much specificity as possible but without attaching the proposed sealed material; shall indicate the proposed duration of the seal request and the reasons why means other than sealing are unavailable or unsatisfactory; shall contain a separate certificate of conference section indicating the results of the parties' meaningful conferral; and shall be filed at last three business days before any related deadline to permit adequate Court consideration. The party seeking authorization to seal material shall not file or otherwise attach the subject material until the Court has ruled on the motion for leave. Finally, all parties are advised that mere designation of material as confidential and/or otherwise subject to a protective order does not bind the Court, does not supplant the requirements of the Local Rules on sealing, and does not otherwise relieve the party seeking sealing/redaction from justifying its request under applicable legal principals governing the presumption of public access to civil proceedings. Failure to comply with this Notice may result in immediate unsealing of any unauthorized shielded material. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 1/28/2026. (nct)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Michael D. Chillemi, D.C, Eric Ferdinand Ciliberti, M.D., and Functional Evaluation Testing of Florida, Inc. (wce) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Aileen M. Cannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Ryon M. McCabe is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (wce) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Michael D. Chillemi, Eric Ferdinand Ciliberti, Functional Evaluation Testing of Florida, Inc.. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-19162719, filed by Government Employees Insurance Co., Geico Casualty Co., GEICO General Insurance Company, Geico Indemnity Co.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Exhibit RICO Chart - Functional Evaluation)(Gershenoff, Max) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
