Booth, Roosevelt v. Taggart et al
| Roosevelt Charles Booth |
| Sergeant Tammi A. Taggart, Sergeant Simmons, Officer Bell, Officer S. Hamby, Sgt. Lawrence and Officer John Doe |
| 9:2026cv80198 |
| February 26, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Ed Artau |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT. Case transferred from Florida Southern has been opened in Middle District of Florida as case 8:26-cv-00644, filed 03/12/2026. (bb) |
| SYSTEM ENTRY - Case 9:26-cv-80198 electronically transferred out to Florida Middle. (gqa) |
Filing 5
ORDER TRANSFERRING MATTER TO THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Closing Case. Signed by Judge Ed Artau on 3/11/2026. See attached document for full details. (gqa)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Roosevelt Charles Booth. Responses due by 3/12/2026. (kma) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Roosevelt Charles Booth. Responses due by 3/12/2026. (kma) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Ed Artau (kma) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against All Defendants. Filing fee $ 405.00, filed by Roosevelt Charles Booth. (IFP Motion filed) (Attachments: #1 Grievances)(kma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.