Wilson v. AMS Moving Inc.
| Chet Michael Wilson |
| AMS Moving Inc. |
| 9:2026cv80334 |
| March 25, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Aileen M Cannon |
| Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice #1 Complaint and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by AMS Moving Inc.. Responses due by 5/26/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Docket List)(Eichhorn, Cory) |
Filing 8
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #6 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. On or before May 12, 2026, Defendant shall file an answer or responsive motion to #1 Plaintiff's Complaint. Moving forward, any requests for extension must be filed sufficiently in advance of the deadline at issue or risk summary denial. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 5/11/2026. (nct)
|
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by AMS Moving Inc. (Eichhorn, Cory) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time DEFENDANT AMS MOVING INC.S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by AMS Moving Inc.. Attorney Cory William Eichhorn added to party AMS Moving Inc.(pty:dft). Responses due by 5/11/2026. (Eichhorn, Cory) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Chet Michael Wilson. AMS Moving Inc. served on 4/7/2026, response/answer due 4/28/2026. (Kaufman, Avi) |
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICES ON SEALING/REDACTION: Notwithstanding the requirements of Local Rule 5.4 and/or any protective order, the parties are prohibited from filing anything under seal or from redacting any content from a court filing or exhibit/attachment (except for the personal data identifiers listed in Section 6A of this District's CM/ECF Administrative Procedures) unless the party with a stated interest in sealing/redaction first seeks and obtains permission from the Court via a motion for leave. The motion for leave must be filed after meaningful conferral with the opposing party (or parties) and be filed publicly except as authorized by prior Court order. Additionally, the motion for leave shall specify the particularized basis for sealing the proposed material; shall describe the information/documents to be sealed with as much specificity as possible but without attaching the proposed sealed material; shall indicate the proposed duration of the seal request and the reasons why means other than sealing are unavailable or unsatisfactory; shall contain a separate certificate of conference section indicating the results of the parties' meaningful conferral; and shall be filed at last three business days before any related deadline to permit adequate Court consideration. The party seeking authorization to seal material shall not file or otherwise attach the subject material until the Court has ruled on the motion for leave. Finally, all parties are advised that mere designation of material as confidential and/or otherwise subject to a protective order does not bind the Court, does not supplant the requirements of the Local Rules on sealing, and does not otherwise relieve the party seeking sealing/redaction from justifying its request under applicable legal principals governing the presumption of public access to civil proceedings. Failure to comply with this Notice may result in immediate unsealing of any unauthorized shielded material. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 3/27/2026. (nct)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to AMS Moving Inc. (caw) |
| Filing 2 Clerk's Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Aileen M. Cannon. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Ryon M. McCabe is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (caw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AMS Moving Inc.. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-19354766, filed by Chet Michael Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kaufman, Avi) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wilson v. AMS Moving Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Chet Michael Wilson | |
| Represented By: | Avi Robert Kaufman |
| Represented By: | Rachel E Kaufman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: AMS Moving Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Cory William Eichhorn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
