MARZ v. MINT MOBILE, LLC
Plaintiff: JOHN MARZ
Defendant: MINT MOBILE, LLC
Case Number: 9:2026cv80459
Filed: April 21, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Donald M Middlebrooks
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 12, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER Closing Case on #8 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal; Dismissing Case (With Prejudice); Closing Case. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 6/12/2026. See attached document for full details. (ls)
June 11, 2026 Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by JOHN MARZ (Schertzer, Andrew)
May 21, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER SETTING DEADLINE TO FILE CLOSING DOCUMENTS AND SUA SPONTE EXTENDING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT. Plaintiff notified the Court that the Parties have settled this matter (DE #6 ), and the Court congratulates them on reaching an early and amicable resolution of this case. The Parties request 45 days to file closing documents and for the Court to adjourn all deadlines in the meantime. That request is denied. No good cause for such a delay is set forth in the Notice, and I do not view a pending settlement as grounds to stay ongoing litigation. I will, however, afford the Parties some latitude since this case settled at an early stage. Closing documents shall be due by June 11, 2026. Moreover, given the posture, and so as not to waste attorney resources, I will also extend Defendant's deadline to Answer the Complaint to the same date. The Parties are advised that I will be strongly disinclined to extend these deadlines further absent compelling circumstances. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 5/21/2026. (kid)
May 20, 2026 Filing 6 NOTICE of Settlement by JOHN MARZ (Schertzer, Andrew)
April 29, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PAPERLESS ORDER granting in part #4 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant seeks an extension of time to respond to the complaint from April 28 to May 28, 2026. In support, Defendant represents that the additional time will allow the Parties to engage in early settlement discussions. Motions for extension of time must set forth good cause supported by specific facts. In the interest of encouraging an early and amicable resolution of this case I will grant an extension, however Defendant does not set forth good cause for the requested month long delay. The Parties can, of course, continue to engage in settlement discussions while this case moves forward in litigation. Therefore the motion is granted in part, and I will extend the deadline for Defendant to respond to the Complaint to May 20, 2026. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 4/29/2026. (kid)
April 28, 2026 Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint),, by MINT MOBILE, LLC. Attorney Henry H Bolz, IV added to party MINT MOBILE, LLC(pty:dft). Responses due by 5/12/2026. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bolz, Henry)
April 27, 2026 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by MINT MOBILE, LLC identifying Corporate Parent T-Mobile USA, Inc., Other Affiliate Deutsche Telekom AG, Other Affiliate T-Mobile Global Zwischenholding GmbH, Other Affiliate T-Mobile US, Inc., Other Affiliate T-Mobile Global Holding GmbH, Other Affiliate Softbank Group Corp., Other Affiliate Delaware Project 6 L.L.C., Other Affiliate Masayoshi Son, Other Affiliate Deutsche Telecom Holding B.V. for MINT MOBILE, LLC (Bernstein, Michelle)
April 21, 2026 Filing 2 Clerk's Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (caw)
April 21, 2026 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 405.00 receipt number BFLSDC-19453470, filed by MINT MOBILE, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Docket, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - State Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit D - Summons, #5 Exhibit E - Service of Summons, #6 Exhibit F - Uniform Differentiated Case Management Order and Order Setting Trial, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bernstein, Michelle) Modified text on 4/22/2026: No Answer/Motion to Dismiss filed (caw).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MARZ v. MINT MOBILE, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOHN MARZ
Represented By: Andrew James Schertzer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MINT MOBILE, LLC
Represented By: Michelle Genet Bernstein
Represented By: Henry H Bolz, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?