Desamour v. AutoNation, Inc. et al
| Ray Briand Desamour |
| AutoNation, Inc. and First Advantage Background Services Corp. |
| 9:2026cv80683 |
| June 9, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| William Matthewman |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER REGARDING MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION. Signed by Ch. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman on 6/9/2026. See attached document for full details. (cwc)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to AutoNation, Inc. and First Advantage Background Services Corp. (cwc) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 6/9/2026 in the amount of $ 405.00, receipt number 10364 (cwc) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Ch. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cwc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AutoNation, Inc., First Advantage Background Services Corp.. Filing fees $ 405.00 Receipt#: 10364, filed by Ray Briand Desamour. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2)(cwc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
