Laing v. McClain
Plaintiff: Tevin Damar Laing
Defendant: Lieutenant William McClain
Case Number: 9:2026cv80906
Filed: July 29, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Ed Artau
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 29, 2026 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tevin Damar Laing. Responses due by 8/12/2026. (kma)
July 29, 2026 Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Ed Artau (kma)
July 29, 2026 Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against William McClain. Filing fee $ 405.00 (IFP Motion filed), filed by Tevin Damar Laing. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Grievance)(kma)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Laing v. McClain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tevin Damar Laing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lieutenant William McClain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?