Ujhelyi Szakacs v. 2842 S. Ocean LL et al
| Roxanne Ujhelyi Szakacs |
| 2842 S. Ocean LL Florida Limited Liability Company doing business as Tideline Ocean Resort and Spa and Tania Elizabeth Villatoro |
| 9:2026cv80921 |
| July 30, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Ryon M McCabe |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Appointment of US Marshal as Special Process Server by Roxanne Ujhelyi Szakacs. Responses due by 8/13/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order)(gqa) |
| Filing 4 Consent by Pro Se Litigant (Non-Prisoner) Roxanne Ujhelyi Szakacs to receive Notices of Electronic Filing at email address: [email protected] (gqa) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Roxanne Ujhelyi Szakacs. Responses due by 8/13/2026. (gqa) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/31/2026: #1 entered in error (gqa). Modified text on 7/31/2026 (gqa). |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Magistrate Judge Ryon M. McCabe (gqa) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against 2842 S. Ocean LL, Tania Elizabeth Villatoro. Filing fee $ 405.00. IFP Filed, filed by Roxanne Ujhelyi Szakacs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) Proposed Summons)(gqa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
