Varoom Whoa, Inc. vs John Does 1-100 et, al
| Varoom Whoa, Inc. |
| John Does 1-100, Jane Does 1-100 and XYZ Companies 1-100 |
| 9:2026cv80962 |
| August 11, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Ed Artau |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 44 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Varoom Whoa, Inc. (Marion, Charles) |
| Filing 3 FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (khrs) (Attachment 1 replaced on 8/11/2026) (khrs). |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Ed Artau. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (khrs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-19853545, filed by Varoom Whoa, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Marion, Charles) |
| SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 4 [motion] restricted/sealed until further notice. (639568) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
