Yokeno v. Sekiguchi et al
| Matao Yokeno |
| Sawako Sekiguchi, Emil Lai and John Does 1-10 |
| 1:2009cv00020 |
| July 30, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Guam |
| Hagatna Office |
| Guam |
| Joaquin V.E. Manibusan |
| Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
169
Order and Opinion re: 16 Motion for Summary Judgment. The court hereby GRANTS the motion in its entirety. Signed by Chief Judge Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood on 8/19/2011. (fad, )
|
|
Filing
166
Order and Opinion Re: 156 Defendants' Objections to Magistrate Judge's Order on June 2, 2011 Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Deposition and 158 Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration of Chief Judge's Order. The cou rt inadvertently overruled Defendants' first and second objections. In light of the fact that the court granted the Motion for Reconsideration, the court finds that the objections are moot and hereby withdraws the inadvertent rulings. The cour t RESCINDS its Order granting Plaintiff's Rule 56(f) Motion and accordingly strikes the depositions of Defendants and all related documents from the record. The parties shall appear before the court for a hearing on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on 08/02/2011 at 09:30 AM. Signed by Chief Judge Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood on 7/27/2011. (fad)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Guam District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
