Capulong v. Department of Education of Guam
Plaintiff: Leodegario M. Capulong
Defendant: Department of Education of Guam
Case Number: 1:2010cv00005
Filed: March 30, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Guam
Office: Hagatna Office
Presiding Judge: Joaquin V.E. Manibusan
Presiding Judge: Joaquin V.E. Manibusan
Presiding Judge: Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 23 Opinion and Order granting 9 Motion to Dismiss under FRCP 12(b)(1), 12(b)(2), 12(b)(4)-12(b)(6), 12(h)(3) and 41(b). Signed by Chief Judge Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood on 3/24/2011. (fad, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Guam District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Capulong v. Department of Education of Guam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leodegario M. Capulong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Education of Guam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?