Lau v. Fernandez et al
| Gabriel H.T. Lau |
| Jon Fernandez, Antonette Santos and Department of Education |
| 1:2016cv00042 |
| May 16, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Guam |
| Hagatna Office |
| Guam |
| Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood |
| Joaquin V.E. Manibusan |
| Assault, Libel, and Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
Order finding as moot 49 Motion to Dismiss; granting 56 Amended Motion to Dismiss. This case is DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood on 10/15/2019. (fad, )
|
|
Filing
28
Order granting in part and denying in part 11 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 25 Request for Status Conference. The court grants and denies in part the Motion to Dismiss. The Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The Plaintiff is order ed to file an amended complaint no later than 30 days from the filing of this Order (March 29, 2017) and to thereafter properly serve a copy of the amended complaint and a summons on each of the Defendants. The Plaintiff is advised that failure to comply with this Order may result in the dismissal of this action with prejudice and/or the imposition of sanctions as deemed appropriate by the court. In light of the court's ruling, the Defendants' Request for Status Conference, see ECF No. 25, is deemed moot. Signed by Chief Judge Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood on 2/27/2017. (fad, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Guam District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
