W.W.W. v. Anthony Sablan Apuron, et al.
| W.W.W. |
| Capuchin Franciscans Custody of Star of the Sea, Anthony Sablan Apuron, Capuchin Franciscans Province of St. Mary, Capuchin Franciscans, DOE ENTITIES 1-10 and DOE-INDIVIDUALS 11-50 |
| 1:2019cv00131 |
| August 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Guam |
| Joaquin VE Manibusan |
| Frances M Tydingco-Gatewood |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Chief Judge Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood nd Superior Court Judge Michael J. Bordall: Joint Status Conference held on 9/27/2019. Stay extended until December 6, 2019. Mr. Perez's request for extension to submit documents in CV-19-18 AND CV-19-48 GRANTED. Documents due by 3:00 p.m. 9/30/2019. Next Joint Status Conference set for 12/6/2019 08:30 AM in 4th Floor Courtroom. (Court Reporter Veronica Flores.) (Start Time: 8:37, End Time: 9:07.) (fad, ) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge (fad, ) |
| Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number GUX015668 re #1 Complaint (fad, ) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number PaymentDue.), filed by W.W.W.. Scheduling Notice due to be issued by 9/24/2019. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet)(Lujan, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Guam District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
