R.G.M. v. Boy Scouts of America et al
R.G.M. |
Boy Scouts of America Aloha Counsel Chamorro District, Boy Scouts of America, DOE Entities 1-5 and DOE Individuals 6-50, inclusive |
1:2020cv00005 |
January 27, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Guam |
Joaquin VE Manibusan |
Frances M Tydingco-Gatewood |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Notice of Commencement of Adversary Proceeding (Civille (non-CJA), G.) |
Filing 6 Suggestion of Bankruptcy Upon the Record filed by Boy Scouts of America. (Civille (non-CJA), G.) |
Filing 5 Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge (fad, ) |
Filing 4 Disclosure of Plaintiff's Name and Place of Residence filed by R.G.M. (fad, ) (fad, ). |
Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number GUX016079 re #1 Complaint, (fad, ) Modified on 1/29/2020 to correct payment date (fad, ). |
Summons Issued as to Boy Scouts of America, Boy Scouts of America Aloha Counsel Chamorro District. (fad, ) |
Filing 3 Cover Sheet, filed by R.G.M..(Berman, Michael) |
Filing 2 Clerk's Notice of Deficiency: Civil Cover Sheet, Form JS-44 due immediately. (fad, ) |
Filing 1 Complaint for Damages - Jury Trial Demanded against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number PaymentDue.), filed by R.G.M.. Scheduling Notice due to be issued by 3/9/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Berman, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Guam District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.