R.R.R. v. Boy Scouts of America et al
| R.R.R. |
| Boy Scouts of America, Capuchin Franciscans Custody of Star of the Sea, Capuchin Franciscans Province of St. Mary, Capuchin Franciscans, DOE Entities 1-5, Doe-Individuals 6-47, inclusive and Boy Scouts of America Aloha Council Chamorro District |
| 1:2020cv00009 |
| February 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Guam |
| Michael J Bordallo |
| Frances M Tydingco-Gatewood |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Chief Judge Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood and Superior Court Magistrate Judge Jonathan Quan. Telephonic Joint Status Conference held on 4/3/2020. Stay extended until 7/2/2020. Next Joint Status Hearing Set for 5/21/2020 at 8:30 a.m. (Court Reporter Veronica Flores.)(Start Time: 8:38, End Time: 9:11.) (fad, ) |
| Filing 3 Clerk's Notice of Deficiency. Document due: Plaintiff's Disclosure of Name and Place of Residence. Document due by 3:00 p.m. Friday, February 28, 2020.. (fad, ) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge (hpg) |
| Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number GUX016123 (hpg) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number PaymentDue.), filed by RRR. Scheduling Notice due to be issued by 3/24/2020. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet)(Lujan, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Guam District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
