BB v. Zermeno, et al.
| BB |
| Doe-Individuals 6-10, Dennis Mark Zermeno and DOE Entities 1-5 |
| 1:2021cv00013 |
| May 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Guam |
| Michael J Bordallo |
| Frances M Tydingco-Gatewood |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
Opposition re #3 First Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION filed by BB. (Lujan, David)
|
|
Filing 5
Scheduling Notice. Scheduling and Planning Conference Report due by 7/20/2021. Scheduling Conference set for 8/3/2021 at 10:00 AM in 3rd Floor Courtroom before US Magistrate Judge Michael J. Bordallo. (fad, )
|
|
Filing 4
Declaration of Specially Appearing Defendant Dennis M. Zermeno re #3 First Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction . (Van de veld, Curtis)
|
|
Filing 3
First Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Dennis Mark Zermeno. (Van de veld, Curtis)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge (fad, )
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint against Dennis Mark Zermeno (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 1.), filed by BB. Scheduling Notice due to be issued by 6/14/2021. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet)(Lujan, David)
|
|
Summons Issued as to Dennis Mark Zermeno. (fad, )
|
|
Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number GUX017044 re #1 Complaint (fad, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Guam District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
