Bonifacio v. Bank of Guam
Plaintiff: Eusebio B Bonifacio and Eusebio B. Bonifacio, Jr.
Defendant: Bank of Guam
Case Number: 1:2022cv00008
Filed: April 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Guam
Presiding Judge: David G Campbell
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER SETTING RULE 16 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: A Video Scheduling Conference is set for 7/6/2022 at 4:30 p.m. (7/7/2022 at 09:30 AM time in Guam) before Senior District Judge David G Campbell. The parties will receive an email with connecting instructions. See attachment for deadlines and details. Signed by Senior District Judge David G Campbell on 6/3/2022. (CLB)
June 3, 2022 Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint by Bank of Guam. (Arriola, Anita)
June 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Order granting the parties' #6 Stipulation to Extend Time to File Answer or Responsive Pleading. Defendant's answer or responsive pleading is due 6/3/2022. Signed by Senior District Judge David G Campbell on 5/31/2022. (Boucher, Christine)
June 1, 2022 Filing 8 Senior District Judge David G Campbell has been designated to preside over this case. (vtk)
May 23, 2022 Filing 7 Notice: the Court is waiting for an assignment of a judge to this case by the Ninth Circuit. (White, Charles)
May 23, 2022 Filing 6 Stipulation to Extend Time to File Answer or Responsive Pleading by Bank of Guam. (Arriola, Anita)
April 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order Of Recusal. Chief Judge Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood recused.. Signed by Chief Judge Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood on 4/12/2022. (fad, )
April 11, 2022 Summons Issued as to Bank of Guam. (fad, )
April 11, 2022 Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number GUX017779 re #1 Complaint (fad, )
April 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order Of Recusal. Judge US Magistrate Judge Michael J. Bordallo recused. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Michael J. Bordallo on 4/11/2022. (fad, )
April 11, 2022 Filing 3 Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge (fad, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/11/2022: #1 Received Copy) (fad, ).
April 8, 2022 Filing 2 Cover Sheet, filed by Eusebio B Bonifacio.(Walsh, Joshua)
April 8, 2022 Filing 1 Complaint Class Action against Bank of Guam (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number PaymentDue.), filed by Eusebio B Bonifacio.(Walsh, Joshua)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Guam District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bonifacio v. Bank of Guam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eusebio B Bonifacio
Represented By: Joshua D. Walsh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eusebio B. Bonifacio, Jr.
Represented By: Joshua D. Walsh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bank of Guam
Represented By: Anita Arriola
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?