Quintanilla v. Arriolla et al
Eli Charfauros Quintanilla |
Attorney Jay Arriolla and Pacific Star Hotel |
1:2022cv00016 |
July 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Guam |
Michael J Bordallo |
Frances M Tydingco-Gatewood |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Court Certificate of Service re #5 Order Dismissing #1 Complaint Without Prejudice - Eli Quintanilla served on 9/12/2022 via first class mail, postage prepaid and Certified Mail No. 7017 1070 0000 5899 0808 at CO Department of Corrections, P.O. Box 3236, Hagatna, Guam 96932 (fad, ) |
Filing 5 Order Dismissing #1 Complaint Without Prejudice. Plaintiff has twenty-one days from the date of this Order to file an amended complaint. Failure to timely file an amended complaint shall result in automatic dismissal.. Signed by Chief Judge Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood on 9/12/2022. (fad, ) |
Filing 4 Proposed Order filed by Eli Charfauros Quintanilla. (fad, ) |
Filing 3 Application to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit filed by Eli Charfauros Quintanilla. (fad, ) |
Filing 2 Request for Summons / Notice to Defendants filed by Eli Charfauros Quintanilla. (fad, ) |
Filing 1 Complaint against All Defendants (IFP PENDING), filed by Eli Charfauros Quintanilla. Scheduling Notice due to be issued by 8/29/2022.(fad, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Guam District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.