Philips v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc.
| Sherif Antoun Philips |
| Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc. |
| 1:2023cv00025 |
| November 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Guam |
| Michael J Bordallo |
| Frances M Tydingco-Gatewood |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Abstention Doctrine, Primary Jurisdiction Doctrine, Rooker-Feldman Doctrine & Motion to Consolidation and Transfer (re #7 Motion) filed by Sherif Antoun Philips.(kbma) |
| Filing 10 Opposition re #7 Motion to Transfer to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal filed by Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G)(Berman, Daniel) |
| Filing 9 Reply to Response re #3 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Under Rule 12(b)(1) filed by Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc.. (Berman, Daniel) |
| Filing 8 Reply and Strike #3 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Under Rule 12(b)(1) filed by Sherif Antoun Philips. (kbma) |
| Filing 7 Motion to Transfer to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal filed by Sherif Antoun Philips. (kbma) |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Service (re #5 Declaration of Counsel, #4 Memorandum in Support, #3 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Under Rule 12(b)(1) ) by Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc.. (Berman, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 Declaration of Counsel re #3 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Under Rule 12(b)(1) and For Sanctions filed by Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc.. (Berman, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 Memorandum in Support re: #3 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Under Rule 12(b)(1) filed by Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc.. (Berman, Daniel) . filed by Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc.. (Berman, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Under Rule 12(b)(1) filed by Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc.. (Berman, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge (fad, ) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal filed by Sherif Antoun Philips from Superior Court of Guam, case number CV-0478-18. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 100000141), filed by Sherif Antoun Philips. Scheduling Notice due to be issued by 12/27/2023.(fad, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Guam District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Philips v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sherif Antoun Philips | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Daniel James Berman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
