Haldeman et al v. Golden et al
| 1:2005cv00810 |
| December 28, 2005 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| KEVIN S.C. CHANG |
| DAVID ALAN EZRA |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
1138
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1137 Findings and Recommendations To Grant Plaintiffs' Motion For Determination Of Good Faith Settlement With Defendants. Signed by JUDGE DAVID AL AN EZRA on 02/19/2014. (eps)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
1106
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT KAREN DUTY'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF SEPARATE JUDGMENT 1096 . Signed by JUDGE DAVID ALAN EZRA on 9/30/2010. (afc)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notificat ions received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
1100
ORDER AFFIRMING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT KAREN DUTY'S MOTION TO REGISTER JUDGMENT. Signed by JUDGE DAVID ALAN EZRA on 8/30/2010. Order affirms U.S. Magistrate Judge Kevin S. C. Chang's Order 1093 : "Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant Karen Duty's Motion to Register Judgment in Arizona and Washington State". Appeal Terminated: 1094 . (afc) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
1080
ORDER AFFIRMING IN PART AND REVERSING IN PART THE REPORT OF SPECIAL MASTER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT KAREN DUTY'S BILL OF COSTS ~ The Report is reversed as to the recommendation that this Court tax $167.54 for court transcripts of Karen Duty's motions for summary judgment. The Report is also reversed as to the recommendation that this Court tax $1,434.34 for copying costs. The Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Karen Duty's request for copying costs. Karen Duty may re-file a request for the copying costs outlined in the instant Bill of Costs but must state why such costs were necessarily obtained for a reimbursable use in the case. The Court taxes costs in the amount of $22,235.08 against P laintiffs. ~ Signed by JUDGE DAVID ALAN EZRA on 5/28/2010. [Report of Special Master: doc no. 1077 . Plaintiffs' Objections: doc no. 1078 . Defendant Karen Duty's Bill of Costs: doc no. 1068 .] (afc)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Haldeman et al v. Golden et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
