Pauline vs. Manuma
Case Number: 1:2006cv00459
Filed: August 24, 2006
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office: Hawaii Office
Presiding Judge: HELEN GILLMOR
Presiding Judge: BARRY M. KURREN
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 5, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER MODIFYING AND ADOPTING 71 MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION. Signed by Chief JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on November 5, 2008. (bbb, )
October 27, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER ADOPTING 70 MAGISTRATE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY DEFENDANT MANUMA'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT. Signed by Chief JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on October 27, 2008. (bbb, )
October 8, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 71 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT DEFENDANT'S 51 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Objections to F&R due by 10/23/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge BARRY M. KURREN on October 8, 2008. (bbb, )
October 7, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 70 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY DEFENDANT MANUMA'S 44 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 56 MOTION TO AMEND 1 COMPLAINT. Objections to F&R due by 10/22/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge BARRY M. KURREN on October 7, 2008. (bbb, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pauline vs. Manuma
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?