Alston et al v. Read, et al
| Darren D. Bajo and Jamie Tafoya |
| Linda Lingle and Does 1-10 |
| 1:2007cv00266 |
| May 18, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| SAMUEL P KING |
| LESLIE E KOBAYASHI |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR STAYOF ACTION PENDING APPEAL 80 AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS'MOTION TO CERTIFY DEFENDANTS APPEAL AS FRIVOLOUS 83 . Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E KOBAYASHI on 4/13/2010. ~ Defendants' Motion f or Stay of Action Pending Appeal, filed on February 17, 2010, is HEREBY GRANTED, and Plaintiffs Motion to Certify Defendants' Appeal as Frivolous, filed on March 8, 2010, is HEREBY DENIED. This Court directs the Clerk's Office to administra tively close this case seventeen days from the entry of this order, unless Plaintiffs seek reconsideration of this order or file an appeal of this order to the district judge. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEPar ticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on 4/14/10 the date of this docket entry Modified on 4/13/2010 (ecs, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
