Click Entertainment, Inc. v. JYP Entertainment Company, Ltd. et al
| Click Entertainment, Inc. |
| JYP Entertainment Company, Ltd., Star M Entertainment, Beom Chang Kang, Revolution Entertainment, Se Hyun Yun, Ji-Hoon Jeong, John Does 1-25, Jane Does 1-25 and Doe Entities 1-20 |
| 1:2007cv00342 |
| June 21, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| KEVIN S.C. CHANG |
| DAVID ALAN EZRA |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
482
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION AS MODIFIED for 475 . Signed by JUDGE ALAN C KAY on 05/31/2012. (eps) -- the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Chang's Findings & Recommendations as modified. Once this Order becomes nonappealable, JYP's escrow agent is authorized to release the $400,000 held in escrow for JYP, plus any interest that may have accrued, to JYP. Once this Order becomes nonappealable, the Clerk of the Court is instructed to release the $400,000 held for Rain, plus any interest that may have accrued, to Rain. The Court's order, however, is not effective until the Court has received, reviewed, and issued an order approving of the verification of payment by JY P to Park in the full amount of the Korean Court orders CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
402
ORDER APPROVING THE AUGUST 7, 2009 STIPULATION AS MODIFIED; AND VACATING THE MARCH 19, 2009 VERDICT AND THE APRIL 6, 2009 AMENDED JUDGMENT re 322 , 290 , 292 . Signed by JUDGE ALAN C KAY. (eps ) -- the Court approves of the Au gust 7, 2009 Stipulation, as modified herein, and orders that the March 19, 2009 Verdict and the April 6, 2009 Amended Judgment be vacated as to all parties. This Order does not affect the default judgments against Star M, Revolution, and Kang < /font>CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications are served by first class mail
|
|
Filing
322
AMENDED JUDGMENT - entered in favor of Plaintiff CLICK ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and against Defendants JYP ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY, LTD. and JI-HOON JEONG, aka RAIN, and STAR M ENTERTAINMENT and REVOLUTION ENTERTAINMENT. (eps ) .
|
|
Filing
251
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION for 231 . Signed by JUDGE ALAN C KAY. (eps ) -- the "Findings and Recommendation To Grant Plaintiff's Motion For Default Judgment As To Defendant Beom Chang Kang"
|
|
Filing
231
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT BEOM CHANG KANG re 190 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Defendant Beom Chang Kang filed by Click Entertainment, Inc.. Signed by JUDGE KEVIN S.C. CHANG. (eps ) -- The Court therefore recommends that the Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment on Proof be granted and that a Judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant Kang in the amount of $2,136,700.00 .
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
