Kamaole Pointe Development LP et al v. County of Maui et al
| Kamaole Pointe Development LP and Alaku Pointe LP |
| County of Maui, G. Riki Hokama, Danny A. Mateo, Michelle Anderson, Gladys Coelho Baisa, Jo Anne Johnson, Bill Kauakea Medeiros, Michael J. Molina, Joseph Pontanilla, Michael P. Victorino, Charmaine Tavares and Vanessa A. Medeiros |
| 1:2007cv00447 |
| August 23, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| DAVID ALAN EZRA |
| LESLIE E KOBAYASHI |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
208
ORDER DENYING 186 PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING 183 DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by JUDGE DAVID ALAN EZRA on 9/29/2009. [Order follows hearing held 9/28/2009; Minutes-dock et entry no. 205 ] (afc) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
135
ORDER DENYING 121 PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 119 DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT "...[T]his Court (1) DISMISSES Plaintiffs' as-applied substantiv e due process and equal protection claims under both the United States and Hawaii constitutions as unripe, (2) DENIES Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to its as-applied procedural due process claim, (3) DENIES Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs' procedural due process claim, and (4) DENIES Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs' preemption claim under Hawaii Revised Statutes §§ 46-141 to 46-148...." Signed by JUDGE DAVID ALAN EZRA on 11/25/2008. (afc)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART COUNTY DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 83 . ~ Summary judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs' facial equal protection and facial due process claims. Summary judgment is DENIED with respec t to County Defendants "class of one" equal protection argument. Plaintiffs' as-applied equal protection and as-applied due process claims remain viable ~ Signed by JUDGE DAVID ALAN EZRA on 9/9/08. [related: 27 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Declaring Ordinance 3418 Void on Its Face Under the Doctrine of Unconstitutional Conditions; 35 County Defendants' M/SJ or in the alternative M/PSJ. 81 : Order.] (afc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
