Barnett v. Luna
| Gregory P. Barnett |
| Frank Luna |
| 1:2007cv00491 |
| September 26, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| BARRY M. KURREN |
| SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
183
ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 158 - Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 1/9/09. (emt, )
|
|
Filing
170
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY 161 - Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 12/8/08. (emt, )
|
|
Filing
149
ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY REGARDING NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED ON NOVEMBER 10, 2008 144 - Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 11/17/08. (cc: Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals) (emt, )
|
|
Filing
146
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT AND OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATES' ORDER DENYING DISCOVERY 141 , 142 - Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 11/13/08. (emt, )
|
|
Filing
129
ORDER ADOPTING AND SUPPLEMENTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION; ORDER DENYING 2254 PETITION 117 , 127 , 128 - Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 10/30/08. ("In light of Barnett's October 24, 2008, objections to the F&R (Doc . No. 127), which he appears to have timely mailed to this court on October 17, 2008, the court vacates the prematurely entered October 16, 2008, order adopting the F&R and vacates the October 17, 2008, Judgment. This renders moot Barnett's Octo ber 28, 2008, Motion to Toll Time for Notice of Appeal (Doc. No. 128), which is denied as a result.". The Court supplements the F&R and denies Barnett's 2254 Petition. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment against Barnett and to close this case.) (emt, )
|
|
Filing
121
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 77 , 117 - Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 10/15/08. (emt, )
|
|
Filing
117
SUPPLEMENTAL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS 1 PETITION AND ORDER DENYING 89 BARNETT'S MOTION FOR DETERMINATION THAT BARNETT'S CURRENT PETITION WAS TIMELY FILED 77 - Signed by Judge BARRY M. KURREN on 9/29/08. Objections to F& R due by 10/15/2008. (This court FINDS that Barnett's claims lack merit and, therefore, RECOMMENDS that Barnett's Petition be DISMISSED in its entirety. Barnett's Motion for Determination that Barnett's Current Petition was Timely Filed is DENIED as moot.) (emt, )
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DENYING EVIDENTIARY HEARING 110 - Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 9/9/08. (emt, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Barnett v. Luna | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Gregory P. Barnett | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Frank Luna | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
