Redell v. NCL America, Inc. et al
| Brenda Redell |
| NCL America, Inc. and Pride of America |
| 1:2007cv00587 |
| December 3, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| DAVID ALAN EZRA |
| LESLIE E KOBAYASHI |
| Marine |
| 46 U.S.C. ยง 688 Jones Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
ORDER: (1) DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS; AND (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS re: Motion, document no. 51 . Excerpts of Order: ~ "The Cour t hereby puts Plaintiff on notice that she must actively prosecute this action. Trial is scheduled to begin on April 20, 2010. Plaintiff is advised that she must be present and ready to proceed as scheduled. Failure to be present at trial will result in dismissal of this action." "[T]his Court DENIES Defendants' request for sanction in the form of precluding Plaintiff from testifying at trial." "Plaintiff is herey PRECLUDED from entering an expert witness." ~ Signed by JUDGE DAVID ALAN EZRA on 4/8/2010. (afc)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
