Bandalan v. Castle & Cooke Resorts, LLC et al
| Anthony Bandalan |
| Castle & Cooke Resorts, LLC, John Does 1-10, Jane Does 1-10, Doe Corporations 1-10, Doe Partnerships 1-10 and Doe Government Entities 1-10 |
| 1:2007cv00591 |
| December 6, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| KEVIN S.C. CHANG |
| DAVID ALAN EZRA |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER ADOPTING 36 REPORT OF SPECIAL MASTER. Signed by District JUDGE DAVID ALAN EZRA on July 24, 2009. (bbb, )
|
|
Filing
36
REPORT OF SPECIAL MASTER ON THE AMOUNT OF RULE 11 SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL. ~ The Court, as Special Master, RECOMMENDS that the district judge award Defendant attorneys' fees in the amount of $17,539.78. ~ Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E KOBAYASHI on 6/30/2009. re: 28 M/Rule 11 Sanctions; 31 Order granting M/Rule 11 Sanctions. (afc)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RULE 11 SANCTIONS. 28 . ~ "...Defendant may file all relevant documentation with the magistrate judge to support the calculation for the amount of the sanctions awarded hereunder." ~ . Signed by JUDGE DAVID ALAN EZRA on 12/22/2008. (afc)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 18 . Signed by JUDGE DAVID ALAN EZRA on 11/12/2008. (afc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
