Thompson v. Thomas et al
| James Allen Thompson |
| Todd Thomas, Clayton A. Frank and Frank Lopez |
| 1:2008cv00218 |
| May 13, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| LESLIE E KOBAYASHI |
| SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
ORDER GRANTING IN PART PETITIONER'S 28 U.S.C. § 2254 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY A PERSON IN STATE CUSTODY re 72 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 8/29/12. -- "The State of Hawaii is directed to re sentence Thompson in a manner consistent with this order. In all other respects, the petition is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in Thompsons favor with respect to the sentence and to close this case. The attorneys of record in this case are directed to ensure that the state court is notified of this ruling, and the Clerk of Court is additionally directed to send a certified copy of this order to the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawaii." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
