United States of America v. Two Hundred Forty-Five Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty-Three Dollars ($245,853.00) in United States Currency
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Two Hundred Forty-Five Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty-Three Dollars ($245,853.00) in United States Currency
Case Number: 1:2009cv00099
Filed: March 6, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office: Drug Related Seizure of Property Office
County: Honolulu
Presiding Judge: KEVIN S.C. CHANG
Presiding Judge: DAVID ALAN EZRA
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Jury Demanded By: 21:881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Two Hundred Forty-Five Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty-Three Dollars ($245,853.00) in United States Currency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Rachel S. Moriyama
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Two Hundred Forty-Five Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty-Three Dollars ($245,853.00) in United States Currency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?