Rossetto v. Oaktree Capital Management, LLC et al
Plaintiff: |
Gustavo Rossetto |
Defendant: |
Oaktree Capital Management, LLC, Kuilima Resort Company, Turtle Bay Resort Hotel, L.L.C., TBR Property, L.L.C., Benchmark Hospitality, Inc. and Doe Defendants 1-50 |
Case Number: |
1:2009cv00144 |
Filed: |
April 3, 2009 |
Court: |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
Office: |
Contract: Other Office |
County: |
Honolulu |
Presiding Judge: |
ALAN C KAY |
Presiding Judge: |
LESLIE E KOBAYASHI |
Nature of Suit: |
Plaintiff |
Cause of Action: |
Federal Question |
Jury Demanded By: |
28:1441 Petition for Removal |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
October 15, 2009 |
Filing
32
ORDER ADOPTING, AS MODIFIED, THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REMAND TO STATE COURT AND TO AWARD ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS 26 , re 18 , 6 . Signed by JUDGE ALAN C KAY on 10/15/09. (eps ) -- In view of the foregoing findings, the Court adopts, as modified, Judge Kobayashi's recommendation and grants both of Plaintiff's Motions for Remand and awards attorneys fees and costs. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
August 28, 2009 |
Filing
26
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REMAND re 6 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Gustavo Rossetto ; 18 . Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E KOBAYASHI. (eps ) - the Court HEREBY FINDS that Defendant s improperly removed the instant case, RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff's Motion for Remand 6 , filed May 1, 2009, be GRANTED and that Plaintiffs Second Motion for Remand 18 , filed July 1, 2009, be deemed moot. The Court further RECOMMENDS an award of fees and costs under § 1447(c). If this Court's recommendations should be adopted, then it is further RECOMMENDED that a deadline should be given for counsel to submit a declaration in conformance with Local Rules 54.2 and 54.3(d) to sup port Plaintiff's request for fees and costs. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry .
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?