Jones v. Waiawa Correctional Facility et al
Brent Christopher Jones |
Waiawa Correctional Facility, Harrington, Dept. of Public Safety, John and Jane Does 1-3, Fountain and Cyrine |
1:2009cv00244 |
June 2, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
Hawaii Office |
Honolulu |
LESLIE E KOBAYASHI |
SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 45 ORDER GRANTING AMENDED MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FILED JUNE 2, 2009 36 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 7/14/10. ("Jones does not show that he timely exhausted his claims before he commenced this action. He also fail ed to commence this action within two years of the date his claims accrued. Because Jones's claims are not subject to tolling, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Summary Judgment are GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgmen t in favor of Defendants and to terminate this action.") (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail addres s listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry. A copy of this order has been served by First Class Mail to Brent Christopher Jones at the address of record on July 15, 2010. |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.