Kealoha v. Department of Public Safety, State of Hawaii et al
Kristopher Kealoha |
Department of Public Safety, State of Hawaii, John Does 1-50, Jane Does 1-50 and Does 1-50 |
1:2009cv00299 |
June 29, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
Hawaii Office |
Honolulu |
BARRY M. KURREN |
J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER Granting In Part and Denying In Part Defendants' Motion For Judgment On The Pleadings 17 . Signed by JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 5/21/10. (gls, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry |
Filing 15 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL 11 - Signed by Judge BARRY M. KURREN on 11/25/09. (IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Myles S. Breiner and Maria F. Erler be allowed to withdraw as counsel in the instant matter. Counsel Myles S. Breiner shall send the entire case file of Kristopher Kealoha via certified mail to him at his last known address of P.O. Box 520, Santa Rosa, New Mexico 88435 and shall include a copy of the Rule 16 Scheduling Order filed on October 30, 2009. Follows oral order of 11/24/09, 14 .) (emt, )No COS issued for this docket entry |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.